Topological phase transition in a ladder of the dimerized Kitaev superconductor chains
Zhou Bo-Zhen, Zhou Bin†,
Department of Physics, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: binzhou@hubu.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11274102), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. NCET-11-0960), and the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (Grant No. 20134208110001).

Abstract
Abstract

We investigate the topological properties of a ladder model of the dimerized Kitaev superconductor chains. The topological class of the system is determined by the relative phase θ between the inter- and intra-chain superconducting pairing. One topological class is the class BDI characterized by the ℤ index, and the other is the class D characterized by the ℤ2 index. For the two different topological classes, the topological phase diagrams of the system are presented by calculating two different topological numbers, i.e., the ℤ index winding number W and the ℤ2 index Majorana number , respectively. In the case of θ =0, the topological class belongs to the class BDI, multiple topological phase transitions accompanying the variation of the number of Majorana zero modes are observed. In the case of θ =π/2 it belongs to the class D. Our results show that for the given value of dimerization, the topologically nontrivial and trivial phases alternate with the variation of chemical potential.

1. Introduction

Majorana fermions are particles which are their own antiparticles and are expected to obey non-Abelian statistics.[1,2] Recently, there is a growing interest in searching for Majorana fermions in the condensed matter physics community.[3] Majorana zero modes (MZMs) are quasiparticle excitations in condensed matter systems and are expected as building blocks of realizing the fault-tolerant topological quantum computation protected from local decoherence.[48] Many theoretical schemes have been proposed to create MZMs in the condensed matter physics systems.[919] Several experiments of detecting the signatures of MZMs in semiconductor nanowires with proximity-induced superconductivity[2023] and iron atomic chains on the surface of the superconducting lead[24] have been reported.

In Kiteav’s pioneering work,[25] it was found that two unpaired MZMs can be localized at the ends of a one-dimensional (1D) spinless p-wave superconductor (i.e., the so-called Kiteav chain). The Kitaev chain is the simplest model that could realize the MZMs, thus the topological properties of the Kiteav chain have attracted considerable interest.[2636] The Kitaev chain has been investigated under the effect of p-wave pairing,[26] parametric pumping,[28] periodically modulated chemical potential,[31] periodically modulated hopping,[32] and classical noise,[33] respectively. The topological order[34] and decoherence[30] in interacting Kitaev chains were also considered. It is proposed that the Kitaev chain system may exhibit the Zitterbewegung oscillations.[35] Wakatsuki et al. studied theoretically the topological phase transitions and fermion fractionalization to Majorana fermions in a 1D dimerized Kitaev superconductor model, which is a hybrid system comprised of the Su–Schrieffer–Heeger (SSH) model[37] and the Kitaev model.[25] Very recently, Liu investigated the effects of the next-nearest-neighbor hopping and nearest-neighbor interactions on topological phases in a 1D dimerized Kitaev chain.[36]

Note that Potter and Lee generalized 1D Kitaev chain to a quasi-1D ladder model of the Kitaev px + ipy superconductor chains.[38] They indicated that the MZMs can be localized at opposite ends of a spinless p-wave superconductor with the strip geometry. A similar set of ideas on Majorana fermions in the quasi-1D wires was discussed by Wimmer et al.[39] Later, Zhou and Shen re-examined an ideal spinless quasi-1D ladder model of the Kitaev px + ipy superconductor chains, studied the topological quantum phase transition in this system and gave the phase diagrams of the presence of MZMs in quasi-1D sample by use of ℤ2 topological index.[40] Up to now, the studies on MZMs in the quasi-1D ladder model of the Kitaev superconductor chains, multichannel spinless p-wave superconducting wires and multiband semiconducting nanowires have also attracted much attention.[4147]

In this paper, we focus on a ladder model of the dimerized Kitaev superconductor chains. We discuss two topological classes of this model and calculate their corresponding topological number ℤ and ℤ2. The phase diagrams with respect to model parameters are demonstrated, and the topological phase transitions in the two distinct topological classes are illustrated.

This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce a ladder model of the dimerized Kitaev chains and discuss the topological class of the model. In Section 3, in order to discuss topological phase transition of the class BDI, we calculate the ℤ index winding number W and obtain the phase diagrams. In Section 4, we focus our attention on the case of the class D, and the ℤ2 index Majorana number is introduced to discuss topological phase transition of the class D. Finally, we summarize our results in Section 5.

2. Model

We consider a ladder model of the dimerized Kitaev chains of spinless p-wave superconductors, the illustration of this model is shown in Fig. 1, which is described by the following tight-binding Hamiltonian

where A and B denote the sublattice indices, j and α are the lattice coordinates corresponding to the x and y axes, μ is the chemical potential, tx (ty) is intra-chain (inter-chain) transfer integral, |Δx| (|Δy|) is intra-chain (inter-chain) superconducting pairing amplitude, and (cA/B,j,α) presents creation (annihilation) operator on site (A/B,j,α). The superconducting pairing phase difference θ between |Δx| and |Δy| is an important feature, which causes the topological class change between the class BDI and the class D.[43] The dimerization parameter η (|η| < 1) is introduced into a ladder model of the Kitaev chains, and it is assumed that it contributes to intra-chain transfer integral and superconducting pairing.[27]

Fig. 1. Illustration of the model. The blue and yellow circles present two sublattices (A and B). The (thick and thin) solid lines indicate the dimerized Kitaev chain, and the dotted lines indicate the inter-chain coupling. α denotes the α-th Kitaev chain along the y axis, and j denotes the j-th unit cell (presented by green oval) containing two sites along the x axis.

Here we assume that the number of the dimerized Kitaev chains is n in the ladder model, and the number of unit cells in each chain is L, that is, the length of lattice site is 2L along the x-axis direction. We note that the system is reduced to a one-dimensional dimerized Kitaev superconductor model when n = 1.[27] Now, one introduces a periodic boundary condition along the x-axis direction, i.e., , and uses the Fourier transform of the operator ,

where k = kx is the wave vector along the x axis, and −πkπ. In the momentum representation, the Bogoliubov–de Gennes Hamiltonian is given by

where ξ and ζ are 2n × 2n matrices with matrix elements

with

The topological class of the Hamiltonian (1) can be clarified according to its behavior under time-reversal symmetry, particle–hole symmetry, as well as chiral symmetry.[48,49] The time-reversal (Θ), the particle–hole (Ξ), and the chiral (Π) operators are defined by Θ = K, Ξ = τxK, and Π = τx, respectively,[43] where K represents the complex conjugate operator and τx is the Pauli matrix in the particle–hole space. We note that the Hamiltonian (1) reduces to a ladder model of the conventional Kitaev chains as the dimerization parameter η = 0.[43] Wakatsuki et al. have indicated that the ladder model without dimerization belongs to the class BDI when the phase difference θ is 0 or π. Otherwise, it becomes the class D. For the ladder model of the dimerized Kitaev chains described by the Hamiltonian (1), we can check that when θ = 0 or π the Hamiltonian (1) still satisfies the following relations: ΘH(k)Θ−1 = H(−k), ΞH(k)Ξ−1 = −H(−k), and ΠH(k)Π−1 = −H(k). Thus, the Hamiltonian (1) with θ = 0 or π still belongs to the class BDI. When the phase difference is θ ≠ 0 or π, we can also check that both the time-reversal symmetry and the chiral symmetry are broken while the particle–hole symmetry is present, so, in this case the topological class of the Hamiltonian (1) is the class D.

In what follows, we will investigate the topological phase transition in the two different topological classes, which is induced by the variation of the superconducting pairing phase difference θ between |Δx| and |Δy|.

3. Topological phase transition of the class BDI

We first discuss the case of θ = 0. As mentioned above, the system belongs to the class BDI which is characterized by the ℤ index. In order to analyze the topological property of the system, we introduce a unitary transformation

where I is a unit matrix. Then, the transformed Hamiltonian is written as

where Ak = 2i(ξζ). The ℤ index is given by the winding number W which can represent the number of the MZMs,

The topological phase diagrams in the (Δ,η) plane are plotted in Fig. 2, where we have taken |Δx| = |Δy| = Δ, ty/tx = 0.5, and μ /tx = 0.5. Obviously, the phase diagram is more complex with the increasing of the number of dimerized Kitaev chains. In the given parameters of the model, the ℤ index is W = n along the Δ axis with η = 0. With the increase of dimerization η, the ℤ index decreases. As an example, along the η axis with Δ/tx = 0.1, multiple topological phase transitions occur, and the ℤ index decreases from n to 0 by 1 at every phase transition with η increasing. But when the pairing amplitude Δ/tx> 0.5, for the even n case the ℤ index decreases by 2 at every phase transition; while for the odd n case the ℤ index decreases by 2 at every phase transition to W = 1, then changes from 1 to 0 with increasing η. For example, along the η axis with Δ /tx = 0.8, for the even n = 4 case, with increasing η the ℤ index first decreases from 4 to 2 at η /tx = 0.614, then from 2 to 0 at η /tx = 0.805; while for the odd n = 5 case the ℤ index changes from 5 to 3 at η /tx = 0.579, from 3 to 1 at η/tx = 0.753, and from 1 to 0 at η /tx = 0.839. Thus, the topological phase of the class BDI characterized by the ℤ index is suppressed by the dimerization. In the topological phase diagram in the (Δ,η), there exists a phase transition point (Δ*,η*). Along the η axis with Δ = Δ*, the topological phase transition occurs from the ℤ index W = n to W = 0 at η = η*. In Fig. 2, the phase transition point (Δ*,η*) can be given numerically, Δ*/tx = ty/tx = 0.5 and η*/tx = 0.559 irrespective of the number n of the dimerized Kitaev chains.

Fig. 2. Phase diagram for the ladder model of the dimerized Kitaev chains as a function of the pairing amplitude and the dimerization with chain numbers n along the y axis. The energy unit is tx, and we have taken θ = 0, |Δx| = |Δy| = Δ, ty = 0.5tx, and μ = 0.5tx. The integer numbers in the figure represent the ℤ index. The white dashed lines guide the value of Δ = 0.1tx. (a) n = 2; (b) n = 3; (c) n = 4; (d) n = 5; (e) n = 6; (f) n = 7.

The topological phase diagrams with ty/tx = 0.3 and η/tx = 0.3 in the (Δ,μ) plane are shown in Fig. 3. It is found that when Δ/tx < 0.3 (cf. Δ/tx = 0.1) along the μ axis multiple topological phase transitions occur, and the ℤ index increases from 0 to n by 1 at every phase transition with the increasing μ. On the other hand, along the Δ axis with μ = 0, the topological phase transition occurs from the ℤ index W = 0 to W = n at Δ/tx = 0.3.

Fig. 3. Phase diagram for the ladder model of the dimerized Kitaev chains as a function of the pairing amplitude and the chemical potential with chains numbers n along the y axis. The energy unit is tx, and we have taken θ = 0, |Δx| = |Δy| = Δ, ty = 0.3tx, and η = 0.3tx. The integer numbers in the figure represent the ℤ index. The white dashed lines guide the value of Δ = 0.1tx. (a) n = 2; (b) n = 3; (c) n = 4; (d) n = 5; (e) n = 6; (f) n = 7.

According to the topological argument, the topologically nontrivial phase corresponds to the existence of the zero energy mode, and the ℤ index gives the number of MZMs, which can be justified by the excitation spectrum obtained by the numerical diagonalization of the Hamiltonian Eq. (1). The energy spectra of the ladder model of the dimerized Kitaev chains with respect to η and μ are plotted in Figs. 4 and 5, respectively. For sufficiently long but finite chains, one can find spatially isolated zero-energy Majorana end states localized at opposite ends of the chains, thus each zero-energy state per chain doubly degenerates due to the two endpoints of the chain. In Fig. 4, numerical diagonalizations show that as η increases, the number of zero-energy decreases by 2 at every phase transition; the energy spectra shown in Fig. 5 present that as μ increases, the number of zero-energy increases by 2 at every phase transition. The results given in Figs. 4 and 5 confirm the topological properties characterized by the ℤ index shown in Figs. 2 and 3 (cf. white dashed line guiding the value of Δ/tx = 0.1).

Fig. 4. Energy spectra with respect to η for the finite chains obtained by numerical diagonalization of the Hamiltonian (1) with parameters: L = 128, θ = 0, ty/tx = 0.5, μ/tx = 0.5, and Δ/tx = 0.1. The numbers of chains are (a) n = 3; (b) n = 4; (c) n = 5; (d) n = 6.
Fig. 5. Energy spectra with respect to μ for the finite chains obtained by numerical diagonalization of the Hamiltonian (1) with parameters: L = 128, θ = 0, ty/tx = 0.3, η/tx = 0.3, and Δ/tx = 0.1. The numbers of chains are (a) n = 3; (b) n = 4; (c) n = 5; (d) n = 6.
4. Topological phase transition of class D

Now we focus our attention on the case with θ = π/2, in which the topological class of Hamiltonian (1) belongs to the class D and is characterized by the ℤ2 index. In the Majorana representation, we define a set of the operators

which satisfies the anticommutation relation and . In the basis of the news operators, the Hamiltonian (1) has the following form

where the elements of the 4n × 4n matrix B(k) are given below

and the other elements are zero. The matrices B(0) and B(π) are antisymmetric, such that we can calculate the Pfaffians Pf(B(0)) and Pf(B(π)). The topological property of the system described by the Hamiltonian (15) is characterized by ℤ2 topological index (Majorana number) :

= + 1 corresponds to topologically trivial states and = −1 to topologically nontrivial states (i.e., the existence of MZMs).

According to Eq. (16), we numerically calculate Majorana number as a function of physical parameters and then plot the phase diagrams showing a sequence of topological phase transition for the different numbers n of the dimerized Kitaev chains. The topological phase diagrams of the class D with θ = π/2 in the (η,μ) plane for the even and odd numbers of chain are shown in Fig. 6, where we have taken |Δx| = |Δy| = 0.8tx and ty = tx. We now analyze these phase diagrams. First, it is observed that for the given value of dimerization η, the topologically nontrivial ( = −1) and trivial phases ( = +1) alternate with the variation of the value of μ. Take the case with the number of chains n = 5 (cf., Fig. 6(d)) as an example, along the μ axis with η/tx = 0.2, = −1 for | μ |/tx < 1, = +1 for 1 < | μ |/tx < 1.42, and again = −1 for 1.42 < | μ|/tx < 1.96, then again = +1 for 1.96 < |μ |/tx < 2.62, and again = −1 for 2.62 < | μ |/tx < 2.96, up to = +1 for | μ |/tx > 2.96. Additionally, it is shown that topologically nontrivial regions in the (η,μ) plane generally shrink with increasing dimerization η. Namely, the topological phase of the class D characterized by the ℤ2 index is also suppressed by the dimerization.

We note also an interesting property from the phase diagrams. For some given parameters, the topological property of the ladder of the dimerized Kitaev chains will show even–odd effects with respect to the number n of chains. For instance, in Fig. 6, when the parameters η/tx = 0.2 and μ/tx = 0.5 are fixed, the topologically nontrivial and trivial phases alternate when the chain numbers n change, = +1 for even n (n = 2,4,6) and = −1 for odd n (n = 3,5,7).

We show energy spectra with finite chains as functions of μ in Fig. 7, where we have set ty/tx = 1.0, η/tx = 0.2, and |Δx|/tx = |Δy|/tx = 0.8. Our numerical results confirm that there are MZMs in topologically nontrivial regions presented in phase diagrams of Fig. 6 (cf., red dashed lines along the μ axis with η/tx = 0.2), while MZMs disappear in topologically trivial regions. Note that the class D is characterized by the ℤ2 index, thus for sufficiently long but finite chains, one can find a pair of MZMs in topologically nontrivial phases due to the two endpoints of every chain. Further, the even–odd effects are not only observed in phase diagrams of Fig. 6, but also appear in the energy spectra of Fig. 7.

Fig. 6. Phase diagram for the ladder model of the dimerized Kitaev chains as a function of the dimerization and the chemical potential with chain numbers n along the y axis. The energy unit is tx, and we have taken θ = π/2, |Δx| = |Δy| = 0.8tx, and ty = tx. Blue region denotes the topologically nontrivial phase ( = −1), and yellow region denotes the topologically trivial phase ( = +1). The red dashed lines guide the value of η = 0.2tx. (a) n = 2; (b) n = 3; (c) n = 4; (d) n = 5; (e) n = 6; (f) n = 7.
Fig. 7. Energy spectra with respect to μ for the finite chains obtained by numerical diagonalization of the Hamiltonian (15) with parameters: L = 512, θ = π/2, ty/tx = 1.0, η/tx = 0.2, and |Δx|/tx = |Δy|/tx = 0.8. The numbers of chains are (a) n = 2; (b) n = 3; (c) n = 4; (d) n = 5.
5. Summary

In this paper, we investigate the topological phase transition of a ladder model of the dimerized Kitaev superconductor chains. The phase difference θ between the inter- and intra-chain superconducting pairings causes the change of topological class of the system between the class BDI and the class D. The system with θ = 0 or π belongs to the class BDI characterized by the ℤ index, and the other is the class D characterized by the ℤ2 index. When the phase difference θ ≠ 0 or π, the topological class of the system is the class D characterized by the ℤ2 index. By calculating two different topological numbers, i.e., the ℤ index winding number W and the ℤ2 index Majorana number , we illustrate the topological phase diagrams of the system. It is observed that the system with θ = 0 belonging to the class BDI undergoes multiple topological phase transitions accompanying the variation of the number of MZMs. In the case of θ = π/2, the system belongs to the class D, it is shown that for the given value of dimerization, the topologically nontrivial and trivial phases alternate with the variation of the value of chemical potential. Furthermore, the even–odd effect is also observed in phase diagrams of the class D. Additionally, it is indicated that the topological phase with MZMs is suppressed by the dimerization. The topological properties presented in phase diagrams are consistent with the results of the energy spectra obtained by numerical diagonalization.

Reference
1Read NGreen D2000Phys. Rev. B6110267
2Ivanov D A2001Phys. Rev. Lett.86268
3Wilczek F2009Nature Phys.5614
4Kitaev A Y2003Ann. Phys.3032
5Nayak CSimon S HStern AFreedman MSarma S D2008Rev. Mod. Phys.801083
6Stern Avon Oppen FMariani E2004Phys. Rev. B70205338
7Akhmerov A R2010Phys. Rev. B82020509(R)
8Hassler FAkhmerov A RHou C YBeenakker C W J2010New J. Phys.12125002
9Fu LKane C L2008Phys. Rev. Lett.100096407
10Akhmerov A RNilsson JBeenakker C W J2009Phys. Rev. Lett.102216404
11Tanaka YYokoyama TNagaosa N2009Phys. Rev. Lett.103107002
12Law K TLee P ANg T K2009Phys. Rev. Lett.103237001
13Linder JTanaka YYokoyama TSudbo ANagaosa N2010Phys. Rev. Lett.104067001
14Ioselevich P AFeigel’man M V2011Phys. Rev. Lett.106077003
15Nilsson JAkhmerov A RBeenakker C W J2008Phys. Rev. Lett.101120403
16Sau J DLutchyn R MTewari SSarma S D2010Phys. Rev. Lett.104040502
17Lutchyn R MSau J DSarma S D2010Phys. Rev. Lett.105077001
18Oreg YRefael Gvon Oppen F2010Phys. Rev. Lett.105177002
19Alicea JOreg YRefael Gvon Oppen FFisher M P A2011Nature Phys.7412
20Mourik VZuo KFrolov S MPlissard S RBakkers E P A MKouwenhoven L P2012Science3361003
21Rokhinson L PLiu XFurdyna J K2012Nature Phys.8795
22Das ARonen YMost YOreg YHeiblum MShtrikman H2012Nature Phys8887
23Albrecht S MHigginbotham A PMadsen MKuemmeth FJespersen T SNygard JKrogstrup PMarcus C M2016Nature531206
24Perge S NDrozdov I KLi JChen HJeon SSeo JMacDonald A HBernevig B AYazdani A2014Science346602
25Kitaev A Y2001Phys. Usp.44131
26Vodola DLepori LErcolessi EGorshkov A VPupillo G2014Phys. Rev. Lett.113156402
27Wakatsuki REzawa MTanaka YNagaosa N2014Phys. Rev. B90014505
28Zvyagin A A2014Phys. Rev. B90014507
29Chen LLiMing WHuang J HYin CXue Z Y2014Phys. Rev. A90012323
30Hg H T2015Sci. Rep.512530
31Lang L JChen S2012Phys. Rev. B86205135
32Gao YZhou THuang HHuang R2015Sci. Rep.517049
33Hu YCai ZBaranov M AZoller P2015Phys. Rev. B92165118
34Katsura HSchuricht DTakahashi M2015Phys. Rev. B92115137
35Zhang QGong J2016Phys. Rev. A93032117
36Liu D P2016Chin. Phys. B25057101
37Su W PSchrieffer J RHeeger A J1978Phys. Rev. Lett.421698
38Potter A CLee P A2010Phys. Rev. Lett.105227003
39Wimmer MAkhmerov A RMedvedyeva M VTworzydlo JBeenakker C W J2010Phys. Rev. Lett.105046803
40Zhou BShen S Q2011Phys. Rev. B84054532
41Kells GMeidan DBrouwer P W2012Phys. Rev. B85060507(R)
42Rieder M TKells GDuckheim MMeidan DBrouwer P W2012Phys. Rev. B86125423
43Wakatsuki REzawa MNagaosa N2014Phys. Rev. B89174514
44Lutchyn R MStanescu T DSarma S D2011Phys. Rev. Lett.106127001
45Potter A CLee P A2011Phys. Rev. B83094525
46Law K TLee P A2011Phys. Rev. B84081304(R)
47Lutchyn R MFisher M P A2011Phys. Rev. B84214528
48Schnyder A PRyu SFurusaki ALudwig A W W2008Phys. Rev. B78195125
49Ryu SSchnyder A PFurusaki JLudwing A W W2010New J. Phys.12065010